ArticleScientific reports2026
Identification of a mitochondrial biomarker signature linking neuroinflammation to neuronal dysfunction in spinal cord injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the lack of reliable biomarkers for mitochondrial dysfunction that drives secondary injury in spinal cord injury (SCI), this study aimed to identify and validate a robust mitochondria-focused biomarker signature by integrating transcriptomic profiling with machine learning. Gene expression data from 113 mouse spinal cord samples were integrated and analyzed to identify a distinct SCI-associated mitochondrial biomarker signature. Dysregulated mitochondrial genes were screened from this dataset. Multiple machine learning algorithms were then applied to derive a high-performing molecular signature. A quantitative nomogram model was constructed based on this signature, and its accuracy in distinguishing pathological SCI states from controls was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). The identified gene upregulation was further validated in an independent SCI mouse model. Finally, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to investigate the biological pathways associated with the gene signature. A high-performing molecular signature comprising five mitochondrial genes, Mcl1, Dhrs1, Tspo, Star, and Pmaip1, was identified. A nomogram model was constructed based on this signature to quantify the mitochondrial dysregulation severity following injury. This model demonstrated high accuracy in reflecting the pathological status, achieving an AUC of 0.931. This signature offers a molecular tool to assess the extent of secondary pathological changes, potentially serving as a biomarker for therapeutic monitoring. The upregulation of all five genes was confirmed in an independent mouse SCI model. GSEA revealed strong associations between the identified signature and the activation of innate immune pathways, alongside the suppression of neuronal function pathways. This study established a robust, descriptive mitochondria-associated gene signature that accurately reflects the transcriptomic alterations following SCI. This signature maps a key pathogenic axis linking mitochondrial dysregulation with neuroimmune pathology. These findings provide a prioritized molecular foundation for future mechanistic investigations and prospective translational studies in SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.