ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
End-of-surgery prediction of postoperative infectious complications from intraoperative vital-sign dynamics.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infections after surgery remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, yet reliable risk stratification at the end of surgery is limited. Intraoperative vital signs are continuously recorded in modern operating rooms but remain an underexploited source of real-time prognostic information. We developed and validated a machine-learning model integrating intraoperative vital-sign dynamics to predict postoperative infections immediately at the end of surgery. We extracted arterial blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, and end-tidal CO₂ time-series from a clinical data warehouse, transforming these signals into interpretable summary, trend, and distributional descriptors. Using routine data from 10,719 surgical procedures, models incorporating interpretable intraoperative time-series features achieved an AUROC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) for infection prediction at the end of surgery, significantly outperforming models based on preoperative variables alone. Model predictions were calibrated across major procedure clusters and interpretable through SHAP-based feature attribution. Our results demonstrate that intraoperative time-series data encode signatures of cumulative surgical and physiological stress, revealing early and clinically actionable signals of postoperative infection risk and enable an explainable machine-learning framework for perioperative monitoring systems. This explainable approach moves risk assessment from delayed postoperative testing to immediate, digital decision support, ready for integration into perioperative monitoring systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.