Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42092103›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Demonstration videos of psychodynamic and systemic techniques in clinical psychology education.

Christin Hannse Reinhardt, Christoph Kröger

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christin Hannse ReinhardtDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany. hannsec@uni-hildesheim.de.ORCID 0009-0001-7939-1803
Christoph KrögerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2176-6078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demonstration videos are an innovative method for teaching approach-specific techniques. This randomised-controlled study examines the impact of approach-specific demonstration videos on students' practical skills. Undergraduate psychology students (N = 123) received approach-specific instructional texts and were then randomised into one of four groups in preparation for a standardised simulation. In two intervention groups (IGs), students watched a video on either psychodynamic or systemic techniques, whereas the control groups (CGs) reviewed the respective instructional text again. In the real-life simulation with a standardised patient, trained psychologists rated approach-specific techniques using behavioural anchors. Students in the systemic IG performed significantly better in systemic techniques (M = 3.91) than those in the systemic CG (M = 3.11), p < .001, d = 1.03. There was no significant difference in the implementation of psychodynamic techniques between the psychodynamic IG (M = 3.22) and CG (M = 3.41), p = .477, d = - 0.19. These findings indicate that students can practically implement techniques from demonstration videos. Videos requiring a more comprehensive theoretical background and insight into psychotherapists' thought processes might be less beneficial for undergraduate students. Further studies are necessary to explore the long-term development of skills through demonstration videos.

Indexed as

Psychology, ClinicalPsychotherapy, PsychodynamicVideo RecordingAdultFemaleHumansMaleStudentsYoung AdultClinical skillsDemonstration videoModellingPsychotherapy trainingStandardised simulationUniversity teaching

Identifiers

PMID42092103
PMCPMC13149835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.