ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-based geospatial assessment of forest structure characteristics and sequestration potential for informed carbon stocks inventories.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Managed forest lands are key contributors to the carbon balance assessment needed for the greenhouse gas inventories on local, regional, national, and global levels. However, forest lands, due to size and complexity, are challenging for detailed spatially-explicit monitoring and, therefore, reliable and automatic assessment of spatial-temporal changes of carbon stocks is limited. This study presents an effective methodology for estimating key forest structure characteristics relevant to sequestration potential by combining management-level inventory data with remote sensing covariates. It primarily focuses on a machine learning (ML) pipeline that integrates an uncertainty quantification stage to support reliable decision-making and environmental analysis. We evaluated three algorithms - Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and TabNet-applied for multispectral satellite measurements. Predictions were made at the stand level inventory data, addressing classification tasks for dominant species and age group, and regression tasks for timber stock, stand height, and average basal area. Forest carbon stock was also derived as a target variable. XGBoost achieved the best overall performance across tasks. For regression, it reached mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) equal to 0.18 for height; 0.24 for basal area; 0.47 for timber stock and 0.37 for carbon stock. The coefficient of determination ([Formula: see text]) of 0.68 across all regression tasks. For classification, XGBoost achieved an average F1-score of 0.70 for age group prediction and 0.83 for dominant species prediction. To address the 'black-box' nature of machine learning models and enhance interpretability, we incorporated a refinement of conformal prediction to quantify predictive uncertainty at a nominal 90% coverage level. As a result, a geospatial mapping tool was developed, enabling the generation of stand-level forest attributes at 10 m spatial resolution, together with corresponding uncertainty estimates, supporting more informed forest management and carbon accounting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.