Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42092089›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning-based geospatial assessment of forest structure characteristics and sequestration potential for informed carbon stocks inventories.

Usman Tasuev, Polina Tregubova, Svetlana Illarionova, Dmitrii Shadrin, Alexander Bernshteyn, Evgeny Burnaev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Usman Tasuev *Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Artificial Intelligence Center, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
Polina Tregubova *Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Artificial Intelligence Center, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
Svetlana Illarionova *Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Artificial Intelligence Center, Moscow, 121205, Russia. s.illarionova@skoltech.ru.
Dmitrii ShadrinSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Artificial Intelligence Center, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
Alexander BernshteynSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Artificial Intelligence Center, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
Evgeny BurnaevSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Artificial Intelligence Center, Moscow, 121205, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 25-71-30008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managed forest lands are key contributors to the carbon balance assessment needed for the greenhouse gas inventories on local, regional, national, and global levels. However, forest lands, due to size and complexity, are challenging for detailed spatially-explicit monitoring and, therefore, reliable and automatic assessment of spatial-temporal changes of carbon stocks is limited. This study presents an effective methodology for estimating key forest structure characteristics relevant to sequestration potential by combining management-level inventory data with remote sensing covariates. It primarily focuses on a machine learning (ML) pipeline that integrates an uncertainty quantification stage to support reliable decision-making and environmental analysis. We evaluated three algorithms - Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and TabNet-applied for multispectral satellite measurements. Predictions were made at the stand level inventory data, addressing classification tasks for dominant species and age group, and regression tasks for timber stock, stand height, and average basal area. Forest carbon stock was also derived as a target variable. XGBoost achieved the best overall performance across tasks. For regression, it reached mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) equal to 0.18 for height; 0.24 for basal area; 0.47 for timber stock and 0.37 for carbon stock. The coefficient of determination ([Formula: see text]) of 0.68 across all regression tasks. For classification, XGBoost achieved an average F1-score of 0.70 for age group prediction and 0.83 for dominant species prediction. To address the 'black-box' nature of machine learning models and enhance interpretability, we incorporated a refinement of conformal prediction to quantify predictive uncertainty at a nominal 90% coverage level. As a result, a geospatial mapping tool was developed, enabling the generation of stand-level forest attributes at 10 m spatial resolution, together with corresponding uncertainty estimates, supporting more informed forest management and carbon accounting.

Identifiers

PMID42092089
PMCPMC13338240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.