ArticleScientific reports2026
Impact of mask wearing on cultivable conjunctival bacteria in Chinese healthcare workers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the temporal impact of mask wearing on cultivable conjunctival bacteria among healthcare workers. Conjunctival samples were collected from 48 participants, who were randomly assigned to wear surgical masks or KN95 respirators. Sampling occurred at baseline (T0, no mask), after 8 h (T1), and after one week of daily wear (T2, ≥ 8 h/day). Microbial cultures were analyzed using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. The viable bacteria were of low diversity, dominated by Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria, encompassing seven families. Staphylococcaceae, Bacillaceae, and Corynebacteriaceae were most prevalent. In the KN95 group, Staphylococcaceae relative abundance was significantly higher at T2 than at T1 (P = 0.009). In the surgical mask group, Corynebacteriaceae abundance was significantly higher at T2 versus T0 and T1, while Bacillaceae was lower (all P < 0.01). Significant differences in Bacillaceae across all timepoints were unique to the KN95 group (all P < 0.01). At T1, Staphylococcaceae abundance was higher in the surgical mask group, while Bacillaceae was lower compared to the KN95 group (P = 0.025 and P = 0.023, respectively). At T2, Corynebacteriaceae abundance was significantly higher in the surgical mask group (P = 0.010). These findings raise the possibility that mask wearing may induce subtle, mask-type-dependent alterations in the cultivable conjunctival bacteria. Further study with a control group is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.