Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42092087›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Impact of mask wearing on cultivable conjunctival bacteria in Chinese healthcare workers.

Wenwen Wei, Yanli Shi, Qingjun Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenwen WeiDepartment of Ophthalmology of Civil Aviation General Hospital, Civil Aviation Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, 100123, China.
Yanli ShiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory of Civil Aviation General Hospital, Civil Aviation Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, 100123, China.
Qingjun HuDepartment of Ophthalmology of Civil Aviation General Hospital, Civil Aviation Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, 100123, China. hqj2026@163.com.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 202228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the temporal impact of mask wearing on cultivable conjunctival bacteria among healthcare workers. Conjunctival samples were collected from 48 participants, who were randomly assigned to wear surgical masks or KN95 respirators. Sampling occurred at baseline (T0, no mask), after 8 h (T1), and after one week of daily wear (T2, ≥ 8 h/day). Microbial cultures were analyzed using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. The viable bacteria were of low diversity, dominated by Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria, encompassing seven families. Staphylococcaceae, Bacillaceae, and Corynebacteriaceae were most prevalent. In the KN95 group, Staphylococcaceae relative abundance was significantly higher at T2 than at T1 (P = 0.009). In the surgical mask group, Corynebacteriaceae abundance was significantly higher at T2 versus T0 and T1, while Bacillaceae was lower (all P < 0.01). Significant differences in Bacillaceae across all timepoints were unique to the KN95 group (all P < 0.01). At T1, Staphylococcaceae abundance was higher in the surgical mask group, while Bacillaceae was lower compared to the KN95 group (P = 0.025 and P = 0.023, respectively). At T2, Corynebacteriaceae abundance was significantly higher in the surgical mask group (P = 0.010). These findings raise the possibility that mask wearing may induce subtle, mask-type-dependent alterations in the cultivable conjunctival bacteria. Further study with a control group is warranted.

Indexed as

BacteriaConjunctivaHealth PersonnelMasksAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedHealthcare workersMask wearingMicrobiotaOcular surface

Identifiers

PMID42092087
PMCPMC13338286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.