ArticleScientific reports2026
EEG-based harmful brain activity classification using deep learning and feature fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of research on harmful brain activity has increased, especially since the standardization of electroencephalography (EEG) terminologies. A continual lack of specialists leads to considerable distress and increased mortality rates among critically ill patients. An automated system that can detect and classify harmful brain activities is crucial, thereby improving patient safety and potentially saving lives. This research presents a new pipeline for classifying harmful brain activities. Multiple features were used for feature fusion, which was implemented via a dual 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) model. A series of experiments was conducted to demonstrate the robustness of the proposed pipeline by using the Harvard Medical School (HMS) dataset. An ablation analysis and explainable AI were utilized to illustrate the robustness of the proposed pipeline. A feature-level fusion scheme for classifying seizures and seizure-like patterns is presented in this study. The best model proposed in this study, i.e., model 8, achieved an accuracy of 98.14% with a loss of 0.05, whereas the 10-fold cross-validation results obtained for the same model yielded an accuracy of 99%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.