Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42092076›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Digital technology affects farmers' participation in rural human settlements governance through dual pathways of economic and social rationality.

Xinhui Peng, Hongmei Wang, Georgina Kuruts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinhui PengCollege of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Hongmei WangCollege of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China. whmeco@nwsuaf.edu.cn.
Georgina KurutsCollege of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although enhancing rural human settlements is fundamental to sustainable rural development, inadequate farmers' participation remains a core governance challenge. As digital technology becomes a vital instrument for rural governance, a critical gap remains in systematically understanding its impact on farmers' participation and the mechanisms involved. This study employs the Ordered Probit model, the instrumental variable method, and the mediation effect model to empirically investigate the impact, mechanisms, and heterogeneity of digital technology on farmers' participation in the governance of rural human settlements. The findings are as follows. First, digital technology significantly promotes farmers' participation, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness tests and addressing endogeneity issues. Second, mechanism tests indicate that digital technology primarily operates through increasing farmers' economic cognition and reinforcing social norm constraints. This reveals the dual logic of its mechanism, which integrates both "economic rationality" and "social rationality". Third, heterogeneity analysis indicates that the promoting effect of digital technology is more pronounced among farmers with elderly care responsibilities and in small-scale villages, reflecting the contextual dependence of its empowering effects. Accordingly, this study proposes recommendations such as optimizing the functional design of digital platforms and implementing differentiated, targeted digital empowerment strategies.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyFarmersRural PopulationAgricultureHumansDigital TechnologyEconomic CognitionRural Human Settlement GovernanceSocial Norm

Identifiers

PMID42092076
PMCPMC13338212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.