ArticleScientific reports2026
Digital technology affects farmers' participation in rural human settlements governance through dual pathways of economic and social rationality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although enhancing rural human settlements is fundamental to sustainable rural development, inadequate farmers' participation remains a core governance challenge. As digital technology becomes a vital instrument for rural governance, a critical gap remains in systematically understanding its impact on farmers' participation and the mechanisms involved. This study employs the Ordered Probit model, the instrumental variable method, and the mediation effect model to empirically investigate the impact, mechanisms, and heterogeneity of digital technology on farmers' participation in the governance of rural human settlements. The findings are as follows. First, digital technology significantly promotes farmers' participation, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness tests and addressing endogeneity issues. Second, mechanism tests indicate that digital technology primarily operates through increasing farmers' economic cognition and reinforcing social norm constraints. This reveals the dual logic of its mechanism, which integrates both "economic rationality" and "social rationality". Third, heterogeneity analysis indicates that the promoting effect of digital technology is more pronounced among farmers with elderly care responsibilities and in small-scale villages, reflecting the contextual dependence of its empowering effects. Accordingly, this study proposes recommendations such as optimizing the functional design of digital platforms and implementing differentiated, targeted digital empowerment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.