ArticleEye (London, England)2026
Multimodal deep learning prediction of treatment response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in diabetic macular oedema.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a multimodal deep learning model that predicts treatment responses to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) by combining optical coherence tomography images and clinical data.
methodsThis study included 107 DMO patients who received three consecutive anti-VEGF treatments. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The model's predictions were compared with those of retinal specialists.
resultsAmong 107 patients, 65 showed good response and 42 showed poor response to treatment. The multimodal model achieved an AUROC of 0.962 (95% CI, 0.945-0.979), accuracy of 0.953 (95% CI, 0.933-0.973), sensitivity of 0.969 (95% CI, 0.951-0.987), and specificity of 0.928 (95% CI, 0.903-0.953) in the internal validation. The model outperformed retinal specialists, who achieved accuracies ranging from 0.571 to 0.857.
conclusionThe multimodal deep learning model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting anti-VEGF treatment responses in DMO patients. This approach could enable more personalised treatment strategies and optimal resource utilisation in ophthalmological care. Further validation with larger, multicentre datasets is warranted to confirm its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.