ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantified impacts of post-fire debris flows on the habitat, population, and recovery of the endangered black abalone.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Invertebrates at the Land-Sea Interface in a Climate Change World: Heatwaves, Floods, Fire and Ice.Global change biology · 2026Review
- Decision-making framework for response and management of environmental disasters (FRaMED).Environmental management · 2026Article
- Quantified impacts of post-fire debris flows on the habitat, population, and recovery of the endangered black abalone.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research on emergent ecological effects of climate change has largely focused on incremental shifts. Meanwhile, extreme climatic events (ECEs), predicted to increase in frequency and severity, produce extraordinary stressors that may be instrumental in determining whether and to what extent species can adapt to incremental environmental shifts. The inherent unpredictability of ECEs temporally, spatially, and in intensity often precludes quantification of impacts, leaving important knowledge gaps to effective resource management and conservation. Here, we identify one trans-ecosystem driver of marine change via multiple terrestrial ECEs (fire + flood = debris flow). After early recognition of the potential for fire-induced impacts to endangered black abalone habitat, we applied predictive modeling to gauge site-specific risks which enabled us to prioritize sites for ephemeral pre-disturbance data collection. Following impacts from multiple post-fire debris flows, we applied a novel model that coupled in situ sampling with long-term monitoring data and aerial imagery to quantify impacts. We attribute a loss of 21% of rocky intertidal habitat and a median population loss of 59.6% of black abalone within the study area to these events. Results highlight the potential for ECEs to disrupt ecological processes in intertidal systems and offer a pathway to meaningful quantification of impacts in the wake of unpredictable and uncontrollable events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.