ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-metric evaluation of a sustainable capillary electrophoresis method for simultaneous therapeutic drug monitoring of Nilotinib and Ofloxacin in oncology clinics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is the most threatening disease worldwide. Noticeably, most cancer patients are immune-compromised, so they are more susceptible to infections. The combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib (NIL) with broad-spectrum antibiotics such as the fluoroquinolone ofloxacin (OFL) is clinically rationalized based on NIL's immunosuppressive effects and the need for infection prophylaxis in cancer patients. However, there is no published method for their in-vivo simultaneous determination in clinical biological specimens to support their pharmacokinetics and therapeutic monitoring. This study focuses on the development of a miniaturized capillary electrophoresis system-assisted with photodiode array detection (CE-PDA) for the simultaneous determination of NIL and OFL in clinical settings for analysis of plasma samples containing NIL and OFL. The conditions of electrophoretic separation of NIL, OFL, and sarafloxacin (SAR, as an internal standard), and the analytical procedures were successfully established. The electrophoretic separation of NIL, OFL, and SAR, as the internal standard, was achieved utilizing a fused silica capillary (58 cm length × 75 μm internal diameter) maintained at 25 °C using a background electrolyte solution composed of borate buffer (20 mM, pH 9.3) at a separation voltage of 30 kV. The linear range of the CE-PDA method in spiked rat plasma was determined to be 0.5-80 µg mL
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.