ArticleScientific reports2026
Cows react to human emotions displayed in videos and use this information to guide subsequent interaction choices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to perceive and interpret emotions from others provides clear evolutionary advantages for social animals. Domestic animals live in close contact with humans, making human emotional cues particularly relevant for them. Understanding how these animals recognise, memorise, and respond to human emotional signals is therefore crucial to investigating their cognitive capacities and their active role in interspecific social interactions. Thus, this study investigates whether cows can discriminate between human expressions and use this information to guide their behaviour in a subsequent choice test. Thirty-nine cows were shown two 30-second videos: one of an experimenter expressing joy and another expressing anger through facial and vocal cues. Afterward, both experimenters simultaneously presented themselves to the cows in a choice test. During video exposure, cows looked longer at the anger video and showed a left-eye bias, suggesting right-hemisphere processing of negatively valenced stimuli. They also displayed more behaviours indicative of a negative perception. In the subsequent choice test, cows spent significantly more time close to the experimenter who had previously expressed joy. These results demonstrate that cows can discriminate and remember human emotional expressions and use this information to guide their choices in future social interactions. This highlights their role as active participants rather than passive observers in interspecific relationships, and provides insight into contexts where such abilities may be expressed, with potential implications for enhancing human-animal relationships and welfare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.