ArticleScientific reports2026
Using deep learning models and exogenous production variables to forecast prices in the Brazilian sugarcane sector.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study developed price forecasting models for the CEPEA/ESALQ White Crystal Sugar and Hydrous Ethanol Fuel indicators, incorporating variables related to sugarcane supply and climatic conditions. Machine learning models such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Transformer, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) were used, along with the statistical Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model, all incorporating exogenous variables. Among these variables are estimates from the Modular Agronomic Simulator for Sugarcane (SAMUCA), data from the National Supply Company (Conab), actual production figures, and a climate indicator constructed from temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation data provided by NASA POWER. Results indicate that models using SAMUCA production estimate exhibited accuracy comparable to those based on historical production data (used as a benchmark), with minor variations in error metrics. The MLP model achieved the best performance for sugar (MAPE of 3.84%), while LSTM was most effective for ethanol (MAPE of 1.87%). Machine learning techniques outperformed traditional methods in capturing seasonal, climatic, and nonlinear patterns. The proposed approach enables price forecasting in advance of the harvest and allows for monthly updates, offering a strategic tool for market stakeholders. The model is also adaptable to other crops and regions with limited production data availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.