ArticleScientific reports2026
Carbon ion stripper for NSTRI tandem accelerator.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Carbon ion stripper for NSTRI tandem accelerator.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tandem accelerator project at the Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI) aims to design and construction a 1.7 MV accelerator for AMS applications. Alongside the design and construction of the high voltage power supply for the intended accelerator, the accelerating tube including the low-energy section, the stripper section, and the high-energy section is also being developed. This paper focuses specifically on the design of the stripper section for a carbon ion beam. In the design of this section, by excluding interactions involving charge states of (q, q-2) and (q, q + 2), a total of 14 interactions between charge states (q, q + 1) and (q, q-1) have been considered. After deriving the interaction cross-sections at the desired energy, the optimal geometry was introduced, and the charge exchange efficiency was calculated for different gas throughputs. At a gas throughput of 9 Standard Cubic Centimeter per Minute (SCCM), an equilibrium thickness of 2.3 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.