Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091925›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Sustainable EV adoption with clustering and predictive modelling for optimal charging infrastructure in the West Midlands and North East UK.

Muhammed Cavus, Shouai Wang, Sanchari Deb, Anurag Sharma, Margaret Bell, Dilum Dissanayake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammed CavusSchool of Engineering Physics and Mathematics, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 8SA, UK.
Shouai WangSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Sanchari DebSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Anurag SharmaFaculty of Science, Agriculture & Engineering (SAgE), Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Margaret BellSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Dilum DissanayakeSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. d.dissanayake@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of electric vehicle (EV) adoption presents significant challenges for charging infrastructure planning and grid integration, particularly at the regional level. However, existing studies often apply machine learning techniques in isolation and lack integrated, region-specific behavioural modelling. This study introduces the Intelligent Sustainable EV Clustering and Analysis Platform (ISE-CAP), an integrated and interpretable analytical framework that advances beyond conventional ML-based EV studies by combining behavioural clustering, predictive modelling, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), and adaptive optimisation within a regionally comparative decision-support architecture. A structured survey dataset comprising 256 EV users from the North East (n = 124) and West Midlands (n = 132) was analysed to examine charging behaviour, adoption motivations, and infrastructure preferences. K-Means clustering identified three distinct EV user groups in each region. Predictive models, including Random Forest, CatBoost, and a compact deep learning architecture, were trained using an 80:20 train-test split with cross-validation achieved high accuracy on the available regional dataset, with the North East model attaining [Formula: see text] = 0.9951 and MSE = 0.0694, indicating a very strong fit to the observed data. On the held-out regional test dataset, the West Midlands model achieved [Formula: see text]= 0.9548 and MSE = 0.6410, indicating strong predictive performance within the analysed sample. Charging behaviour analysis indicates that 85% of users prefer DC fast chargers, with most users (66% in the West Midlands and 53% in the North East) willing to travel up to 3 km for charging. Cost savings accounted for 65% of EV purchases in the North East, while environmental concerns accounted for 30% in the West Midlands, based on regional frequency distributions. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified charging duration, real-time station availability, and cost as the most influential factors associated with charger selection preferences. The findings highlight regional heterogeneity in charging behaviour and infrastructure needs, emphasising the importance of adaptive and interpretable modelling approaches. While results are specific to the analysed regions, the ISE-CAP framework provides a scalable decision-support architecture for sustainable EV infrastructure optimisation in smart city contexts.

Indexed as

ClusteringElectric vehiclesISE-CAPMachine learningPredictive modellingSmart chargingSustainable mobility

Identifiers

PMID42091925
PMCPMC13149656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.