Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091913›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2026

Systemic drivers of toxic food adulteration: lead chromate in turmeric across eastern India.

Jenna E Forsyth, Manu Sinha, Amogh Bandekar, Dinsha Mistree, Manoj Parida, Emily Nash, Lavanya Nambiar, Christlee Elmera, Stephen P Luby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jenna E ForsythSchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. jforsyth@stanford.edu.
Manu SinhaFrameworks, Bhopal, India.
Amogh BandekarKing Center on Global Development, Stanford, CA, USA.
Dinsha MistreeHoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Manoj ParidaDCOR, New Delhi, India.
Emily NashPure Earth, New York City, NY, USA.
Lavanya NambiarPure Earth, New York City, NY, USA.
Christlee ElmeraKing Center on Global Development, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stephen P LubySchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food adulteration poses a growing threat to the integrity of food systems and public health globally. This study investigated turmeric adulteration with lead chromate across five eastern Indian states through a combination of sample analysis and qualitative supply chain assessments. We collected 503 turmeric samples from 34 cities and conducted 128 stakeholder interviews between 2021-2023. In total, 30% of turmeric samples exceeded India's permissible lead limit of 10 µg g⁻¹, with the highest levels in the state of Bihar (geometric mean: 48 µg g⁻¹, maximum: 6,416 µg g⁻¹). Adulteration primarily served to enhance turmeric root color and extend shelf life. Although regulations prohibit lead in turmeric, enforcement has been inconsistent-hindered by limited capacity and the prioritization of more immediate or visible issues. Using population-level exposure modeling, we estimate that halting the practice of turmeric adulteration with lead chromate could increase child IQ by up to 2.3 points, resulting in future income gains of US$ 239 million to 1.6 billion annually in Bihar alone. If cardiovascular disease mortality reductions are included, there would be an additional benefit of approximately US$ 430 million to 2.8 billion per year. Our findings underscore the urgent need for strengthened governance and targeted supply chain interventions.

Identifiers

PMID42091913
PMCPMC13357593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.