Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091835›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

Substance use and the value of control.

Elle M Giovanni, Mimi Liljeholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elle M GiovanniDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Mimi LiljeholmDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. m.liljeholm@uci.edu.

Funding

Training Program in Substance Use and Use DisordersT32DA050558 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WOOD, MARCELO ANDRES · 2020 to 2024
$892k
National Science Foundation 1654187NIDA NIH HHS 1T32DA050558-01NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA050558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical criteria for substance-use disorder collectively specify a loss of instrumental control over consumption; yet little empirical work has addressed how substance use shapes the utility of agency in motivated behavior. We combined a hierarchical gambling task with cross-sectional substance-use surveys and computational cognitive modeling to assess the preference for controllable environments in adult humans with self-reported abstinence from psychostimulants, opioids, alcohol, or sedatives. For psychostimulant use, longer abstinence selectively increased the preference for instrumental control. In contrast, for opioids and alcohol, longer abstinence respectively predicted increased preferences for divergent outcome distributions and free choice, regardless of controllability. These associations between substance use and decision making were dissociable from participants' ability to maximize monetary payoffs in controllable environments. Our findings implicate the dopaminergic system in agency coding.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingMotivationSubstance-Related DisordersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGamblingHumansMaleSense of AgencyYoung AdultAbstinenceInstrumental controlIntrinsic motivationSubjective utilitySubstance use

Identifiers

PMID42091835
PMCPMC13615113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.