ReviewCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Neurotransmitters in memory destabilization: An integrative perspective framed by prediction error and novelty.
Review in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Memory destabilization is a critical phase in memory reconsolidation, during which the transient disruption of consolidated memory traces allows for the incorporation of new information, supporting memory updating and adaptive behavioral modification. While neurotransmitter release and receptor signaling during memory reactivation are known to trigger memory destabilization, the underlying regulatory networks and dynamic interactions remain unclear. Existing studies often examine neurotransmitters in isolation, lacking a unified framework. This review introduces a novel integrative framework that organizes existing evidence on neurotransmitter-mediated memory destabilization around novelty and prediction error (PE) signaling. By synthesizing experimental findings across dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), acetylcholine (ACh), the glutamatergic/GABAergic systems, and the endocannabinoid system, we analyze how PE and novelty engage distinct yet interacting neural pathways. Integrating experimental data and theoretical concepts from multiple systems, we propose the PE-Novelty-Neurotransmitter Network-a unified framework explaining how multimodal neurotransmitter co-release across the midbrain-locus coeruleus-cortex circuit dynamically regulates the balance between memory stability and flexibility. This review addresses diverse memory types, with a focus on maladaptive memories, while also discussing emotional and nonemotional memories. It further discusses potential clinical implications, particularly how neuromodulatory process related to PE and novelty may inform strategies for modifying maladaptive memories and enhancing cognitive flexibility. By bridging mechanistic insights with translational considerations, this work establishes a unified framework for understanding memory plasticity and informs future efforts to translate basic neuroscience into therapeutic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42091833What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.