ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Automated detection of pediatric forearm fractures in X-ray images using deep learning.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children's bones are more elastic and have a thicker periosteum than those of adults, resulting in subtle, incomplete fractures. Diagnosis based on plain radiographs alone can be challenging. The shortage of pediatric radiologists compounds this difficulty, leading to a risk of missed fractures. Therefore, we considered that it might be possible to help prevent missed fractures by developing and validating an automated detection model for pediatric forearm fractures on plain radiographs using deep learning techniques (convolutional neural networks [CNNs] and Vision Transformers [ViTs]). To train and validate such a model, this study targeted the frontal and lateral views of plain radiographs from 517 patients aged 1-14 years with forearm fractures. We first performed preprocessing to focus on the forearm region in the images. Thirteen models (visual geometry group [VGG], ResNet, DenseNet, and ViT) were used to classify the presence or absence of fractures and were evaluated and compared using 5-fold cross-validation. Verification of these models showed that VGG16 exhibited the best performance. The overall result, which integrated the predictions from the frontal and lateral views, achieved a sensitivity of 0.872 ± 0.015, a specificity of 0.925 ± 0.016, a balanced accuracy of 0.898 ± 0.003, and an AUC of 0.962 ± 0.002. Furthermore, visualization of saliency maps (using gradient-weighted class activation mapping and an attention map) revealed that the model focused on the bone during prediction. Therefore, if the proposed method is used in hospitals, it could possibly support diagnosis and help reduce missed fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42091806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.