ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
The effects of intelligibility on conflict resolution and monitoring during speech recognition in noise.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Listeners have difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments, confusing similar sounding words. Cognitive control may be important for segregating the speech signal from background noise and/or selecting between phonological competitors in the mental lexicon. Although cognitive control abilities may be related to speech recognition in noise, the extent to which engaging cognitive control causally improves speech recognition in background noise is unclear. The present study presented pictures that matched (congruent trials) or were phonological neighbors (incongruent trials) of the spoken word to manipulate cognitive control during speech recognition in multitalker babble at + 6 and + 8 dB signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). As conflict increases cognitive control levels, performance following incongruent trials indexes the effect of cognitive control on recognizing speech in noise. Following conflict, participants became faster and more accurate at repeating back speech at + 6 dB SNR and more accurate at + 8 dB SNR. When comparing across SNRs (including a + 4 dB SNR from a previous study), higher SNRs reduced the interference effect, predicting better recognition on incongruent trials; however, SNR did not significantly modulate postconflict improvements in word recognition. Results suggest engaging cognitive control improves speech recognition in noise across SNR levels where recognition is challenging but possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.