Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091777›Full record

ReviewCell regeneration (London, England)2026

Cellular senescence in skeletal muscle regeneration.

Xingyuan Liu, Huating Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell regeneration (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xingyuan LiuDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Huating WangDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. huating.wang@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5474-2905

Funding

General Research Fund (GRF) from Research Grants Council (RGC) of the HongKong (HK) Special Administrative Region, China 14106521Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF) from Health Bureau of HK 10210906National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFA0806003National Major Science and Technology Projects of China 2024ZD0530400National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle possesses a remarkable capacity for regeneration, driven by the activation and proliferation of Pax7-positive muscle stem cells within a dynamic niche that includes immune cells, fibro-adipogenic progenitors, endothelial cells, pericytes, and neural elements. Cellular senescence, a stress-induced program featuring stable cell-cycle arrest and the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), has emerged as a critical yet paradoxical regulator of this process. Accumulating evidence indicates that transient senescence, particularly in FAPs, macrophages, and other niche cells during acute muscle injury, plays a beneficial role in supporting muscle regeneration. These senescent cells promote cellular plasticity, enhance myoblast differentiation, facilitate phagocytic clearance of debris, and modulate inflammation and repair via timely SASP factor secretion. However, conflicting findings suggest that senescent cells exert detrimental effects, impairing regeneration by establishing a sustained pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic niche, especially when senescence persists in aged or dystrophic muscle. This review synthesizes the complex and contradictory roles of cellular senescence in skeletal muscle regeneration, underscores the distinction between transient pro-regenerative and persistent deleterious senescence, highlights the importance of cell-type-specific contributions, and emphasizes the need for precise characterization of senescent cell dynamics and fate. Resolving these discrepancies will be critical for developing targeted senotherapeutic strategies to enhance muscle regeneration in aging and degenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Cellular senescenceSASPSkeletal muscle regeneration

Identifiers

PMID42091777
PMCPMC13149731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.