ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026
Deciphering Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients with Large-Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke using BOLD Cerebrovascular Reactivity.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring Hemispheric Vulnerability in Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Behavioural neurology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) is characterized by reduced perfusion and metabolism in the cerebellar hemisphere contralateral to a supratentorial lesion. In large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (LVO-AIS), CCD may result from hemodynamic impairment, structural injury, or both. From a blood-oxygenation-level-dependent cerebrovascular reactivity (BOLD-CVR) imaging database, we identified patients with anterior-circulation LVO-AIS who underwent BOLD-CVR MRI within 7 days of symptom onset. Patients were stratified into those with persistent occlusion (non-endovascular thrombectomy, non-EVT) and those imaged after successful reperfusion (EVT). CCD was defined by a cerebellar asymmetry index > 12%. Associations between CCD and imaging markers of structural injury (infarct lesion volume) and hemodynamic impairment (steal phenomenon volume) as well as associations with 90-day functional outcome were assessed using logistic regression models. Sensitivity analyses included multiple imputation and best-/worst-case scenarios for missing outcomes. Seventy-nine patients were included (23 EVT, 56 non-EVT). CCD was present in 35% of EVT and 41% of non-EVT patients. In non-EVT patients, CCD was independently associated with larger steal phenomenon volumes (adjusted OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.12-3.73), but not infarct size. In EVT patients, CCD was associated with larger infarct lesions (adjusted OR 5.75; 95% CI 1.41-68.92) but not steal phenomenon volume. CCD predicted poorer 90-day outcome only in non-EVT patients in complete-case analysis, but this association was not robust in sensitivity analyses. CCD in acute LVO-AIS reflects different mechanisms depending on occlusion status: hemodynamic impairment under persistent occlusion and structural injury after reperfusion. BOLD-CVR imaging provides insight into CCD, though larger studies are needed to clarify its prognostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42091776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.