ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Determinants of transition readiness among adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review.
Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer face complex challenges during the transition to adult-oriented cancer care, highlighting the importance of identifying facilitators and inhibitors of transition readiness. This study aimed to identify the determinants of transition readiness among AYA survivors of childhood cancer.
methodsThis study employed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, and Wiley between December 15 and 31, 2025. Eligible studies were full-text English-language articles published between January 2015 and December 2025 that involved AYA childhood cancer survivors aged 15-39 years. Data were synthesized narratively using an inductive approach to identify key themes within the framework of Meleis' Transition Theory.
resultsA total of 17 studies from eight countries were included. Determinants of transition readiness were grouped into three transition conditions: personal, community, and societal factors. Personal factors included beliefs and attitudes, socioeconomic status, preparation and knowledge, mental and psychological health, and clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Community factors included relationships with healthcare providers, family and peer support, communication and shared decision-making, and community resources and services. Societal factors reflected the influence of the healthcare system, continuity and coordination of care, policy and insurance, and geographic context.
conclusionTransition readiness is shaped by multidimensional determinants that interact at the personal, community, and societal levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These findings underscore the need for a multidimensional, integrated approach to planning and implementing healthcare transitions from pediatric to adult care for AYA survivors of childhood cancer. They highlight key factors influencing transition readiness. For healthcare professionals, these findings provide an evidence-based foundation to deliver comprehensive, age-appropriate transitional care. For researchers, this synthesis identifies critical knowledge gaps, refines theoretical and measurement frameworks, and guides the development and evaluation of targeted transition interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42091775What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.