ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2026
Peritoneal cytology in pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive review on prognostic stratification and clinical decision-making.
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is characterized by its high malignancy, aggressive nature, and exceedingly poor prognosis. While surgical resection combined with systemic therapy offers the only potential for cure, the high recurrence rate significantly compromises long-term survival, even after radical surgery. The presence of peritoneal free tumor cells, detected via peritoneal cytology, represents a form of metastatic spread distinct from traditional distant metastases and exerts a similarly negative impact on patient outcomes. Peritoneal washing cytology is a practical and valuable diagnostic tool for identifying intraperitoneal free tumor cells, providing critical insights into disease progression and prognosis. Its status retains significant prognostic relevance even after initial clinical stratification based on resectability. Furthermore, peritoneal cytology plays a pivotal role in guiding clinical decision-making. Notably, the conversion from positive to negative cytology following preoperative therapy may select patients who could benefit from conversion surgery, potentially counteracting the adverse prognostic effects associated with peritoneal dissemination. This review comprehensively examines the etiology and risk factors associated with positive peritoneal cytology, integrates its prognostic value into current stratification systems, discusses its profound implications for clinical decision-making, explores emerging detection technologies, and shares future perspectives. By synthesizing existing evidence, this review aims to contribute to optimized individualized treatment approaches and improved clinical outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42091747What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.