ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Detailed evaluation of the long-term outcomes of repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: A single-center retrospective study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a treatment option for residual brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) following incomplete response to an initial SRS, and this study aimed to clarify the long-term outcomes. Patients who underwent repeat SRS between 1990 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcome was a favorable patient outcome, defined as AVM obliteration without post-SRS hemorrhage or symptomatic T2 signal change/late radiation-induced complications (LRICs). Fifty-eight patients with a median follow-up of 97 months were analyzed. Six patients (10.3%) experienced recurrent hemorrhage between the initial and repeat SRS, indicating high risk of hemorrhage in this cohort. Favorable patient outcome was achieved in 41 patients (70.7%), with 3- and 5-year cumulative rates of 68.1% and 79.2%. Maximum dose was associated with a favorable patient outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.14; p = 0.016). AVM obliteration was achieved in 47 patients (81.0%), with 3- and 5-year rates of 69.2% and 85.0%. Three patients (5.2%) experienced post-repeat SRS hemorrhage, with an annual hemorrhage rate of 1.66%/person-year. Five patients (8.6%) experienced LRICs requiring resection with 5- and 10-year rates of 4.0% and 6.9%. T2 signal change after initial SRS (HR 17.11, 95% CI 1.06-276.55; p = 0.046) and initial maximum diameter > 25 mm (HR 21.12, 95% CI 1.01-442.76; p = 0.049) were associated with LRICs. Repeat SRS demonstrated long-term favorable outcomes in patients at a high risk of hemorrhage. A longer follow-up duration is important, as in the case of LRICs, which could be predicted by T2 signal change and nidus size before repeat SRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42091744What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.