Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091740›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Serum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) as a predictive biomarker for Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN): consideration of current evidence, validation steps, and barriers to CIPN biomarker implementation in clinical practice-a narrative review.

Paola Alberti, Sara Faithfull, Andreas A Argyriou, David Balayssac, Daniel L Hertz, Maryam Lustberg, Susanna B Park, Tiffany Li, Mary Tanay, Terri Jabaley and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Paola AlbertiSchool of Medicine & Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy.
Sara FaithfullDiscipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Andreas A ArgyriouDepartment of Neurology, "Agios Andreas" General Hospital of Patras, Kalavriton 37 Str, 26335, Patras, Greece.
David BalayssacDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation (DRCI), CHU Clermont-Ferrand (Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital), Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Daniel L HertzCollege of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, 428 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1065, USA.
Maryam LustbergYale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Susanna B ParkFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences and Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Tiffany LiFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences and Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Mary TanayBerkshire Cancer Centre, Royal Berkshire NHS Trust, Reading, UK.
Terri JabaleyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, BP 1140L, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Lise Worthen-ChaudhariDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dodd Rehabilitation Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Colombus, OH, 43210, USA.
Ellen M L SmithDepartment of Acute, Chronic & Continuing Care, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, 2101 Magnolia Avenue, Room 225, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA. esmith3@uab.edu.
MASCC Neurological complications study group

Funding

Dance-based Avenues to Advance Nonpharmacologic treatment of Chemotherapy Effects (DAANCE): a multicenter trialR01AG084676 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Maryam B. Lustberg, Lise C. Worthen-Chaudhari · 2024 to 2026
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG084676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral anticancer drugs can cause chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) in approximately 70% of patients; of these, 30% continue to have chronic symptoms hampering quality of life. As more people live with and beyond cancer therapy, it is becoming increasingly important for clinicians to assess those at higher risk of CIPN and provide care for managing CIPN severity. Biomarkers could be appropriate in this regard. However, an initial step towards biomarker-informed care is to advance scientific knowledge regarding the potential of current biomarkers such as neurofilament light chain (NfL). Here, outcomes of a CIPN biomarker workshop and discussions among clinical and scientific experts held during the MASCC 2024 annual conference are reported. The aims of this work are to (1) identify knowledge gaps regarding the potential for serum NfL (sNfL) as a predictive CIPN biomarker, (2) provide guidance for future biomarker research, and (3) explore whether sNfL is ready for use in clinical practice.

methodsConsensus of the experts was gained using a Normative Group Technique. A two-stage iterative approach was used: Stage 1 involved a literature review and an in-person workshop; Stage 2 involved a virtual zoom event to confirm understanding and priorities following the workshop.

resultsEleven studies identified that increases in serum NfL after receiving 2-3 chemotherapy doses are associated with CIPN severity post treatment. Despite preliminary evidence suggesting positive correlations among sNfL and CIPN objective and subjective measures, wide variation in sNfL levels, the prescribed neurotoxic chemotherapy agent, dose and schedule, and symptom assessment time points make it difficult to use sNfL as a predictor of CIPN severity.

conclusionsWhile there is potential for sNfL to be a useful biomarker, larger scale research exploring the predictive value is needed before sNfL can be used to inform clinical decision-making. Identifying links with validated clinical assessments could be utilized to enhance biomarker accuracy and to address the multiple pathological mechanisms of neurotoxicity that occur from the differing chemotherapies. Moreover, workshop participants identified significant barriers to biomarker implementation (e.g. costs, long processing time, and unknown cut off points).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeurofilament ProteinsNeurotoxicity SyndromesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesBiomarkersHumansNeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsQuality of LifeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersneurofilament protein LNeurofilament ProteinsBiomarkersCancer survivorsCIPNNfLQuality of lifesNfL

Identifiers

PMID42091740
PMCPMC13149631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.