ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Biomonitoring of bisphenol A, S, and F in urine samples from children in Finland.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bisphenol A (BPA) and its analogues bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF) are widely used in consumer products and linked to endocrine-disrupting effects. Young children may be especially vulnerable. This study assessed urinary concentrations of BPA, BPS, and BPF in Finnish children and evaluated health risks using biomonitoring guidance values and exposure modeling. First-morning urine samples were collected from 40 children aged 3-6 years in Tampere, Finland. BPA, BPS, and BPF were quantified using triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Estimated daily intakes (EDIs) for BPA were derived using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) reverse dosimetry approach. Risk characterization was performed using Human Biomonitoring Guidance Values (HBM-GVs), interpreted in the context of the 2015 and 2023 EFSA tolerable daily intake values. BPA was quantifiable in 32.5% of samples and BPS in 15%, while BPF was not detected. Estimated BPA intakes (0.015-0.474 µg/kg bw/day) exceeded the 2023 EFSA TDI (0.2 ng/kg bw/day) by factors of 74-2,370. Under the updated TDI, all measured concentrations would exceed thresholds. For BPS, the maximum concentration (2.3 ng/mL) exceeded its HBM-GV (1 ng/mL), while no updated EFSA TDI is available. This study provides the first biomonitoring data on BPA, BPS, and BPF in Finnish children. BPA levels were lower than those reported in recent European studies, suggesting declining exposure trends. However, updated health-based benchmarks indicate that BPA intakes exceeded the 2023 EFSA TDI, while BPS levels exceeded its HBM guidance value. These findings highlight the need for continued biomonitoring and updated guidance values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.