ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Translation and cultural adaptation of Rowland universal dementia assessment scale (RUDAS) and European cross-cultural neuropsychological test battery (CNTB) into Italian.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn increasing number of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) patients have sought cognitive assessment in Italian Centers for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia (CCDDs) in recent years; however, validated cross-cultural cognitive tools in Italian remain limited. The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) and the European Cross-Cultural Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) were developed to minimize linguistic and cultural bias.
objectiveTo translate and culturally adapt the RUDAS and CNTB into Italian for use in Italian CCDDs, both with native Italian speakers and with CALD patients assessed via trained cultural mediators.
methodsA step-by-step methodology was applied: forward translation, synthesis I, blind backward translation, synthesis II, and cognitive debriefing. Two bilingual and bicultural translator pairs completed the translations. Pre-final versions were tested in 40 monolingual Italian participants (8 mild cognitive impairment, 8 dementia, 24 healthy controls; mean age 71.4 ± 10.1 years; mean education 9.9 ± 3.8 years). The purpose of this phase was exclusively to evaluate comprehensibility, conceptual clarity, and cultural appropriateness; no psychometric or normative analyses were performed. Two subtests of CNTB could not be translated due to copyright restrictions.
resultsOnly minor adaptations were necessary. In the RUDAS memory item, "tea" was replaced with "coffee" and "cooking oil" with "olive oil," reflecting Italian cultural familiarity. Within the CNTB, only the Enhanced Cued Recall Task and Serial Threes required clarification.
conclusionThe Italian versions of the RUDAS and CNTB required minimal adaptation. Future studies should assess psychometric properties, diagnostic accuracy, and normative performance in both native Italian and CALD populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42091724What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.