Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091724›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Translation and cultural adaptation of Rowland universal dementia assessment scale (RUDAS) and European cross-cultural neuropsychological test battery (CNTB) into Italian.

I Cova, G Maestri, A Forgione, M Canevelli, C Calia, V Leta, S Pomati, L Pantoni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

I CovaNeurology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi 74, Milan, 20157, Italy. ilaria.cova@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-6791
G MaestriNeurology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi 74, Milan, 20157, Italy.
A ForgioneNeurology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi 74, Milan, 20157, Italy.
M CanevelliDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
C CaliaSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
V LetaParkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
S PomatiIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
L PantoniNeurology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via Giovanni Battista Grassi 74, Milan, 20157, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute GR-2021-12372081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increasing number of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) patients have sought cognitive assessment in Italian Centers for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia (CCDDs) in recent years; however, validated cross-cultural cognitive tools in Italian remain limited. The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) and the European Cross-Cultural Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) were developed to minimize linguistic and cultural bias.

objectiveTo translate and culturally adapt the RUDAS and CNTB into Italian for use in Italian CCDDs, both with native Italian speakers and with CALD patients assessed via trained cultural mediators.

methodsA step-by-step methodology was applied: forward translation, synthesis I, blind backward translation, synthesis II, and cognitive debriefing. Two bilingual and bicultural translator pairs completed the translations. Pre-final versions were tested in 40 monolingual Italian participants (8 mild cognitive impairment, 8 dementia, 24 healthy controls; mean age 71.4 ± 10.1 years; mean education 9.9 ± 3.8 years). The purpose of this phase was exclusively to evaluate comprehensibility, conceptual clarity, and cultural appropriateness; no psychometric or normative analyses were performed. Two subtests of CNTB could not be translated due to copyright restrictions.

resultsOnly minor adaptations were necessary. In the RUDAS memory item, "tea" was replaced with "coffee" and "cooking oil" with "olive oil," reflecting Italian cultural familiarity. Within the CNTB, only the Enhanced Cued Recall Task and Serial Threes required clarification.

conclusionThe Italian versions of the RUDAS and CNTB required minimal adaptation. Future studies should assess psychometric properties, diagnostic accuracy, and normative performance in both native Italian and CALD populations.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionCross-Cultural ComparisonDementiaNeuropsychological TestsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsTranslationsCross-cultural cognitive assessmentCultural adaptationCulturally and linguistically diverse populationsDementia diagnosisNeuropsychological tests

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.