SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Impact of novel systemic cancer therapies on osseointegration and dental implant outcomes: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdvances in systemic cancer therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and anti-angiogenic agents have markedly improved survival in patients with solid and hematologic malignancies. As survivorship increases, oral rehabilitation with dental implants is increasingly sought to restore quality of life. However, these therapies may adversely affect bone healing, angiogenesis, and immune regulation, raising concerns regarding implant-related complications. This systematic review aimed to evaluate reported dental implant outcomes and complications in patients receiving novel systemic cancer therapies, emphasizing the implications for supportive oncology.
methodsThis review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251142681). PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English-language clinical reports describing dental implant outcomes in patients treated with ICIs, TKIs, or anti-angiogenic agents. Study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for case reports were performed independently by two reviewers.
resultsSeven case reports (2017-2024) were included, representing Level IV evidence. Two cases involving TKIs reported successful osseointegration and long-term survival. In contrast, five cases described adverse outcomes including early failure and MRONJ predominantly associated with anti-angiogenic agents, either alone or in combination with ICIs and antiresorptive agents. These complications often resulted in significant functional morbidity and the need for invasive surgical intervention.
conclusionBased on limited case report evidence, anti-angiogenic therapies were more frequently observed in cases with adverse outcomes, including implant-related MRONJ and failure, while TKIs were associated with favorable outcomes in limited cases. The role of ICIs remains unclear due to sparse data, particularly regarding monotherapy effects. Given the preliminary nature of current evidence derived from case reports, prospective studies with appropriate control groups are urgently needed to establish evidence-based guidelines. PROSPERO NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: CRD420251142681; 08/09/2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42091720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.