Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091716›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Maternal concern and refusal toward neonatal heel-prick screening: a cross-sectional survey from Türkiye.

Hatice Turgut, Gülseda Boz, Tuba Güven, Ramazan Özdemir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hatice TurgutDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-7852
Gülseda BozDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey. gulseda.boz@inonu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1959-0226
Tuba GüvenDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0949-8865
Ramazan ÖzdemirDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4722-1188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal heel-prick screening is a key component of preventive healthcare, and its effectiveness is strongly influenced by parents' knowledge, perceptions, and willingness to engage in screening. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between mothers' sociodemographic characteristics and their attitudes and behaviors toward the screening process and the level of concern they experience regarding newborn screening. This cross-sectional study included 350 mothers. Data on sociodemographic characteristics and knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding neonatal heel-prick screening were collected using a researcher-developed structured questionnaire. Maternal concern, defined as a self-reported binary outcome (present/absent), was the primary outcome variable. Associations were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, and variables with p < 0.10 in univariable analyses were entered into a multivariable Firth's penalized logistic regression model. The results are presented as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and a two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Among 350 mothers, 17.7% reported concern related to the heel-prick test, and 9.7% refused the procedure. Concern was more common among those who refused the test (73.5% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.001) and those with vaccine concern (42.5% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.001). According to the results of the multivariable analysis, vaccine concern was the strongest independent predictor (aOR = 8.98; 95% CI: 4.56-18.69; p < 0.001), whereas rural residence (aOR = 3.18; p = 0.032) and perceiving the procedure as painful (aOR = 4.70; p < 0.001) were also significant risk factors.

conclusionThis study revealed that maternal concern about heel-prick screening was associated with insufficient knowledge, negative perceptions of the procedure, concerns about the vaccine, rural residence, and cultural factors. These findings suggest that clear communication, effective education, and culturally sensitive counselling may help reduce maternal concern and improve participation in newborn screening programs. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Parental knowledge, perceptions, and communication with healthcare professionals are important determinants of participation in newborn screening programs. WHAT IS NEW: • Maternal concern toward neonatal heel-prick screening was independently associated with vaccine concern, perceived procedural pain, and rural residence, highlighting the need for targeted and culturally sensitive counselling.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMothersNeonatal ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment RefusalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeelHumansInfant, NewbornSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyYoung AdultDried-blood-spot testingHeel-prick screeningMaternal concernNeonatal screening

Identifiers

PMID42091716
PMCPMC13149568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.