Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091713›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Spinal nerves as landmarks for spinal cord segment delineation: cervical cross-sectional area measurement in healthy subjects.

Tayssir Boushila, Mouna Sahnoun, Fathi Kallel, Nadia Bouattour, Mariem Damak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tayssir BoushilaLaboratory on Advanced Technologies for Image & Signal Processing, National School of Electronics and Telecommunications, University of Sfax, Sfax Technopark, BP 1163, 3018, Sfax, Tunisia. tayssirboushila3@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1230-3303
Mouna SahnounLaboratory on Advanced Technologies for Image & Signal Processing, National School of Electronics and Telecommunications, University of Sfax, Sfax Technopark, BP 1163, 3018, Sfax, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0609-3116
Fathi KallelLaboratory on Advanced Technologies for Image & Signal Processing, National School of Electronics and Telecommunications, University of Sfax, Sfax Technopark, BP 1163, 3018, Sfax, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7986-8395
Nadia BouattourNeurology's Department, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia. bouattour_nadia@medecinesfax.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-8917
Mariem DamakNeurology's Department, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia. mariem_benamar@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-2154

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Tunisia PRC2024- D3P03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise measurement of Spinal Cord Cross-Sectional Area (SC-CSA) is crucial for monitoring SC health and diagnosing neurodegenerative diseases. Accurate measurement of SC-CSA is challenging due to several factors such as SC curvature, patient positioning, segmentation methods, and limitations of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) resolution. Traditional methods that rely on vertebral levels as a reference suffer from inter-subject variability and limited reproducibility. In this study, we propose a novel landmark-based method to define robust anatomical references for standardizing the delineation of SC segment boundaries for SC-CSA measurements. This approach relies on consecutive spinal nerve midpoints (CNMPs) as anatomical references, providing more precise segment delineation and consistent SC-CSA measurements. We validated the effectiveness and robustness of our method using two public datasets of healthy individuals: the first comprises MRI images from different scanners and centers, and the second offers three different head positions for the cervical SC. Experimental results show an intra-subject mean coefficient of variation across head positions of 4.01 ± 2.89% for the proposed CNMP-based landmarks, compared to 4.46 ± 3.10% for vertebral-based landmarks. This demonstrates that the proposed CNMP method can serve as a reliable reference for reducing the variability of CSA measurements compared to the vertebral levels method. Our findings suggest that this approach could potentially aid in the diagnosis of pathological cohorts.

Indexed as

Cross-sectional area measurementMR imagesSpinal cord quantification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.