ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2026
Life Cycle Analysis for Agricultural Residues and Related Products.
Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agricultural residues represent an abundant and underutilized resource that can be redirected from disposal pathways toward value-added applications such as composting, mulching, bioenergy, land amendment, and bioplastics. This chapter examines these pathways through the perspective of life cycle assessment (LCA), highlighting how agricultural residues can contribute to waste reduction, soil improvement, greenhouse gas mitigation, and circular resource use. Across the reviewed case studies, environmental outcomes are shown to depend not only on the residue itself, but also on the selected conversion pathway, management practice, system boundary, and local implementation context. Composting and mulching can reduce environmental burdens, although benefits remain sensitive to process modifications, additive use, and field conditions. Energy recovery from residues can offer substantial gains when carbon-intensive reference systems are displaced, but performance varies with logistics and conversion efficiency. Land application may improve soil quality and carbon retention while also shifting greenhouse gas fluxes depending on amendment type and site conditions. Likewise, residue-derived bioplastics can lower impacts relative to fossil-based plastics under favorable feedstock and end-of-life scenarios, but these benefits are not universal. Overall, the chapter shows that LCA is a valuable tool for comparing residue management options while also emphasizing the need for integrated assessment frameworks that account for environmental, technical, and implementation-related factors when selecting sustainable valorization strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42091694What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.