ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2026
The multi-omics regulatory landscape of human early embryogenesis.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human early embryonic development relies on a highly coordinated regulatory network, which establishes the molecular foundation for individual life. These early events are closely associated with assisted reproductive outcomes, embryo quality assessment, and the etiology of developmental disorders. Although studies in model organisms such as mice have elucidated several key regulatory mechanisms, research on human embryos has progressed relatively slowly due to long-standing challenges in sample acquisition and ethical constraints. In recent years, advances in single-cell omics and high-throughput technologies for ultra-low-input samples, combined with the appropriate utilization of clinically discarded embryos-including parthenogenetic (PG), androgenetic (AG), tripronuclear (3PN), and normal bipronuclear (2PN) embryos-have enabled the systematic profiling of the transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics during human early embryogenesis. This review summarizes the developmental potential and molecular characteristics of different embryo types, synthesizes key multi-omics findings on the regulation of human embryogenesis, and untangles the complex cooperation and imbalance between parental genomes in shaping cell fate decisions. Furthermore, we compare species-specific and shared regulatory mechanisms between humans and mice, providing a conceptual framework for constructing more physiologically relevant models of human early development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.