ArticleClinical neuroradiology2026
Evans' Index and Frontal and Occipital Horn Ratio in Correlation to Volumetric Data of Lateral Ventricles in a Population-based MRI Study.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEvans' Index (EI) and Frontal and Occipital Horn Ratio (FOHR) are routinely used in screening for enlargement of the ventricular system. However, both lack epidemiological definition of normal values in adults. In a representative, randomized sample of adult normal population in Germany we studied the correlation of lateral ventricle volumes with EI and FOHR to evaluate the performance of pre-established cutoff values of EI > 0.3 and FOHR > 0.37, and to introduce age- and sex-specific thresholds, which for FOHR do not yet exist in adults.
methodsIn a population-based sample of 3058 subjects of the "Study of Health in Pomerania" (SHIP), aged 21-90 years, brain imaging with T1 weighted MPRAGE with 1 mm isotropic voxel-size was obtained. We semiautomatically determined the volumes of the lateral ventricles and manually performed measurements to calculate EI and FOHR for every individual. Besides descriptive statistics, ROC analyses were carried out to determine test performance of both parameters. Negative and positive predictive values were derived from contingency analyses.
resultsAverage values were 0.257 ± 0.025 for EI and 0.363 ± 0.024 for FOHR, with sex- and age-depending differences. Using the established cut-off value of EI > 0.3, this index achieved high specificity of 97.1% and moderate sensitivity of 55.3% for diagnosing ventricular enlargement. Using a threshold of > 0.4, FOHR achieved a specificity of 93.4%, and higher sensitivity of 81.4%. FOHR showed stronger correlation with actual lateral ventricle volumes, as compared to EI (r
conclusionFor the first time, EI and FOHR were evaluated in a reasonable sized, randomized, representative sample of normal adult population in Germany, and were confirmed as useful screening tools in the diagnosis of ventricular enlargement. We introduce a cut-off value of > 0.4 for FOHR in adults, with emphasis on specific caveats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.