ArticleScientific reports2026
Damage mechanisms of pumice concrete under wind-sand erosion and freeze-thaw cycles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the durability evolution of pumice concrete with three different strength grades, using natural pumice from Inner Mongolia, China, as the coarse aggregate. A self-developed wind-sand flow erosion apparatus and a rapid freeze-thaw cycling system were employed to examine the coupled effects of wind-sand erosion and freeze-thaw cycles on the concrete in cold regions. The durability was characterized by measuring the mass loss rate, relative dynamic elastic modulus, and pore structure using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). The multi-factor coupled deterioration mechanism was systematically revealed. The results indicate that the combined impact of wind-sand erosion and freeze-thaw cycles causes more severe damage compared to individual factors. Wind-sand erosion acts as a "catalyst", damaging the surface cement mortar layer and accelerating freeze-thaw degradation. For instance, in the LC20 test group, the mass loss rate of the freeze-thaw group was 4.34%, whereas the wind erosion and freeze-thaw coupling group exhibited a 6.60% mass loss. After five freeze-thaw cycles, the relative dynamic elastic modulus of the freeze-thaw group dropped below 60% of its initial value. In contrast, the wind-sand erosion and freeze-thaw coupling group experienced a similar reduction after just three freeze-thaw cycles. The relative dynamic elastic modulus is more sensitive than the mass loss rate in reflecting concrete deterioration. NMR analysis reveals that higher water-cement ratios result in an increase in harmful large pores within the concrete, while free fluid saturation serves as a potential indicator for assessing pumice concrete durability. For critical structures in northern frigid wind-sand regions, implementing wind-sand protection measures is essential for effectively extending their service life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.