ArticleScientific reports2026
Two-layer evolutionary optimization problem for home healthcare pathways and scheduling under multi-center resource sharing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address inter-center workload imbalance and low resource utilization in multi-center home healthcare systems, this study proposes a bilevel optimization approach for routing and scheduling that enables cross-center resource sharing. First, we formulate a weighted single-objective model that jointly accounts for travel time, service costs, penalties for time-window violations, and workload-imbalance penalties, thereby providing a unified representation of multi-criteria trade-offs while incorporating skill-matching and labor-compliance constraints. Second, we develop a bilevel evolutionary framework, termed the Bilevel Evolutionary Planning Framework for Multi-Center Routing and Scheduling with Resource Sharing (BEPSF). At the upper level, a genetic algorithm (GA) determines client-to-center assignments and performs global workload regulation. At the lower level, a hybrid GAPSO strategy is employed to solve the within-center routing and scheduling of multi-skilled staff, integrating a time-window-driven feasibility repair mechanism with an elitist preservation strategy to enhance solution accuracy and robustness. Computational experiments on 18 standardized benchmark instances demonstrate that BEPSF significantly outperforms the GA-GA and DE-DE baselines in both solution quality and stability, achieving average improvements of approximately 31% and 63%, respectively, and attaining 0% deviation from the reference optimum on small-scale instances. Sensitivity and scenario analyses further reveal that maximum working hours, time-window tolerance, and break intervals substantially affect the cost composition. After enabling cross-center resource sharing, the total system cost is generally reduced by 20-50%, with a maximum reduction of 66%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.