Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091631›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Adaptive multimodal learning for driver cognitive state monitoring using transformer-based fusion with personalized meta-learning and federated optimization.

G Abinaya, K Dinakaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G AbinayaDepartment of Information Technology, Saveetha Engineering College, Chennai, India. gabinaya@saveetha.ac.in.
K DinakaranDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vel Tech Multi Tech Dr. Rangarajan Dr. Sakunthala Engineering College, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Road accidents caused by driver fatigue and cognitive overload remain a significant public safety concern. According to recent traffic safety data, drowsy driving contributes to thousands of fatal accidents each year, emphasizing the urgent need for intelligent driver monitoring systems. To address this, we propose an adaptive multimodal deep learning framework (AML) for real-time cognitive workload assessment and fatigue detection, leveraging the CL-Drive dataset: a multimodal repository of EEG (cognitive load), ECG (cardiac activity), EDA (electrodermal arousal), and gaze tracking (visual attention) captured from 21 participants during simulated driving across nine scenarios of escalating complexity. Our framework integrates a hybrid CNN-BiLSTM architecture to extract spatiotemporal features from raw physiological signals and gaze sequences, capturing localized spatial patterns and long-term temporal dynamics. These features are fused using a transformer-based network with cross-modal attention, which models interactions between modalities (e.g., correlating gaze fixation losses with EEG theta-band surges during distraction) and yields a 3.6 percentage-point absolute accuracy improvement over the strongest conventional fusion baseline under identical evaluation. To address individual variability and privacy, we combine personalized meta-learning-adapting to new drivers with as few as five windowed samples (∼10 s of synchronized multimodal data) via episodic fine-tuning-with federated optimization, enabling decentralized model updates and reducing per-client data transfer by 38% through adaptive gradient compression. Experiments on CL-Drive demonstrate state-of-the-art performance under strictly cross-subject evaluation. Under subject-independent 5-fold cross-validation, AML achieves [Formula: see text] accuracy on binary cognitive load classification without personalization, rising to [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] calibration samples (∼40 s). Under the more rigorous leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) protocol, AML reaches [Formula: see text] without personalization and [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] personalization, an improvement of 1.6 percentage points over the strongest published LOSO baseline on this dataset with a further 6.2-11.3 percentage points gained from personalization alone across the LOSO and 5-fold protocols. The framework exhibits robustness to real-world sensor noise (e.g., EEG/EDA motion artifacts) and achieves [Formula: see text] LOSO accuracy with only [Formula: see text] samples (∼10 s of calibration per new driver), critical for scalable in-vehicle deployment. By enabling privacy-aware, real-time monitoring of driver states, this work advances intelligent vehicle safety systems and provides a blueprint for adaptive multimodal learning in human-centric AI applications.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingCognitionDeep LearningAdaptive AlgorithmsAttentionElectroencephalographyFederated LearningHumansCNN-BiLSTMCognitive workload assessmentCross-subject generalizationDriver monitoring systemFederated learningMeta-learningMultimodal physiological signalsTransformer-based fusion

Identifiers

PMID42091631
PMCPMC13338199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.