ArticleNature communications2026
Burden-aware feedback control of microbial consortia.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Burden-aware feedback control of microbial consortia.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Engineered microbial consortia are emerging as programmable systems capable of sensing and responding to their environment. However, maintaining defined community composition over time remains challenging, particularly in bioprocesses where growth conditions and metabolic burdens continuously shift. Here, we develop a burden-aware multicellular RNA-based feedback control system that stabilises coculture composition by coupling gene expression burden to growth regulation. The system integrates three modules: quorum sensing-based communication, an RNA-based comparator computing deviations from a target ratio, and tuneable growth regulation via heterologous expression burden or CRISPRi-mediated knockdowns. In a two-strain E. coli coculture, this architecture maintains stable coculture ratios over 24-hour batch cultures, recovers growth rates by up to 90% following burden-induced growth reduction, and increases protein production yields by up to 81% in the slower-growing strain. We achieve tuneability by adjusting RNA binding strength and quorum-sensing signal production. This work demonstrates that burden-driven growth control can be used to stabilise and tune synthetic microbial consortia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.