Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091425›Full record

ArticleBMJ mental health2026

Cognition and future depression: associations with risk in those with and without a history of depression.

Angharad N de Cates, Angeline Lee, Laura Winchester, Klaus P Ebmeier, Paris Lalousis, Rachel Upthegrove, Susannah E Murphy, Catherine J Harmer, Thomas Nichols, Anya Topiwala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angharad N de CatesInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK a.n.decates@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7848-1295
Angeline LeeBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6068-2689
Laura WinchesterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Klaus P EbmeierDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-7038
Paris LalousisInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Rachel UpthegroveInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Susannah E MurphyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Catherine J HarmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Thomas NicholsBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anya TopiwalaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203141/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 216430/Z/19/ZWellcome Trust 306069/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive impairments are common in depression and often persist beyond mood resolution. However, the relationship between cognitive performance, its neurological underpinnings, and future depression risk is unclear, limiting strategies for primary and secondary prevention.

objectiveOur objective was to determine whether cognition associates with subsequent depression, both relapse and first-episode occurrences.

methods1862 UK Biobank participants with a history of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10-defined depression in remission (RD) (mean (SD) age: 52.7 (7.13) years) were age-matched and sex-matched to 1862 participants without depression history or current antidepressant use. Cognitive scores were compared between groups at the composite (z-score), domain and task levels. MRI-derived phenotypes assessed brain network structure and functional connectivity. Longitudinal associations with future depression were assessed using logistic regression models and a Cox proportional hazards model controlling for key confounders.

findingsParticipants with RD had a higher risk of future depression (33%) than controls (13%), including when we accounted for temporal differences in longitudinal assessment (HR=3.16 (95% CI 2.71 to 3.67), global proportional hazard assumption p=0.07). Composite cognitive performance in controls was inversely associated with future depression risk (risk estimated marginal means: 0.25% at -1SD, 0.20% at mean, 0.15% at +1 SD). In RD, this relationship was reversed (0.74% at -1SD, 0.90% at mean, 1.10% at +1 SD). Executive functioning, processing speed and reasoning task scores all contributed. Higher grey matter in default mode network regions was associated with better concurrent cognitive performance across all participants, but not with future depression risk. Other MRI findings were limited.

conclusionsRD carried a threefold higher risk of future depression than controls. Cognitive performance was a risk marker for future depression in both groups but in opposing directions. Neuroimaging metrics provided little predictive value. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Personalised risk factor assessment for depression is likely to be dependent on depression history. Those without previous history of diagnosed depression are at higher risk of future depression when cognitive performance is lower at baseline. RD is a high-risk group for future depression, and those with relatively higher cognitive performance may be more likely to report future depressive symptoms.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionDepressionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsRecurrenceRisk FactorsUnited KingdomCognition DisordersDepressive DisorderPsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID42091425
PMCPMC13150916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.