ArticleBMJ mental health2026
Cognition and future depression: associations with risk in those with and without a history of depression.
Article in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive impairments are common in depression and often persist beyond mood resolution. However, the relationship between cognitive performance, its neurological underpinnings, and future depression risk is unclear, limiting strategies for primary and secondary prevention.
objectiveOur objective was to determine whether cognition associates with subsequent depression, both relapse and first-episode occurrences.
methods1862 UK Biobank participants with a history of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10-defined depression in remission (RD) (mean (SD) age: 52.7 (7.13) years) were age-matched and sex-matched to 1862 participants without depression history or current antidepressant use. Cognitive scores were compared between groups at the composite (z-score), domain and task levels. MRI-derived phenotypes assessed brain network structure and functional connectivity. Longitudinal associations with future depression were assessed using logistic regression models and a Cox proportional hazards model controlling for key confounders.
findingsParticipants with RD had a higher risk of future depression (33%) than controls (13%), including when we accounted for temporal differences in longitudinal assessment (HR=3.16 (95% CI 2.71 to 3.67), global proportional hazard assumption p=0.07). Composite cognitive performance in controls was inversely associated with future depression risk (risk estimated marginal means: 0.25% at -1SD, 0.20% at mean, 0.15% at +1 SD). In RD, this relationship was reversed (0.74% at -1SD, 0.90% at mean, 1.10% at +1 SD). Executive functioning, processing speed and reasoning task scores all contributed. Higher grey matter in default mode network regions was associated with better concurrent cognitive performance across all participants, but not with future depression risk. Other MRI findings were limited.
conclusionsRD carried a threefold higher risk of future depression than controls. Cognitive performance was a risk marker for future depression in both groups but in opposing directions. Neuroimaging metrics provided little predictive value. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Personalised risk factor assessment for depression is likely to be dependent on depression history. Those without previous history of diagnosed depression are at higher risk of future depression when cognitive performance is lower at baseline. RD is a high-risk group for future depression, and those with relatively higher cognitive performance may be more likely to report future depressive symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.