Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091187›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2026

Improving patient well-being in subacute care: a quality improvement initiative.

Petra Bierer, Marina Brown, Madison Chapman, Kate Laver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Petra BiererDivision of Rehabilitation, Aged Care and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Marina BrownCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University Caring Futures Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Madison ChapmanCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University Caring Futures Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-8857-4749
Kate LaverDivision of Rehabilitation, Aged Care and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia Kate.laver@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0259-2209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals experience lower levels of well-being when admitted to hospital. Maximising well-being may lead to improved outcomes for patients and the health service. We aimed to (1) implement co-designed strategies to improve patient well-being on subacute wards, (2) evaluate the well-being levels of the patient cohort before and after implementation and (3) identify barriers and enablers to implementation of strategies. We conducted a quality improvement study with pre-post evaluation across six subacute wards in a tertiary hospital. Data from interviews with patients and meetings between ward staff and management enabled the co-design of strategies to enhance patient well-being. Strategies were prioritised and implemented using plan, do, study, act cycles. Well-being levels were assessed in the cohort using a scale before (n=153) and after (n=145) implementation. A total of 17 strategies to optimise patient well-being were generated; each ward prioritised implementing key strategies relevant to their setting. While intentions to implement the strategies were high, implementation fidelity of strategies varied due to several barriers identified by staff. Well-being levels reported by patients after implementation were not significantly different from those reported by patients before. Despite extensive consultation and co-design of strategies with patients and staff, well-being levels were not improved at the conclusion of the improvement project. Confounders (such as high hospital demand at the follow-up evaluation time) may have impacted results. Suboptimal implementation fidelity may have also reduced the impact of the initiative.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementSubacute CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingQualitative ResearchHealth services researchQuality improvementQuality of LifeRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42091187
PMCPMC13150900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.