Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091169›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2026

Early sepsis prediction using a hybrid LSTM-GAT model: a study on the PhysioNet 2019 dataset.

Bahar Khorram, Samaneh Kouchaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bahar KhorramDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK bk00531@surrey.ac.uk.
Samaneh KouchakiDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSepsis is a potentially fatal systemic response to infection, in which early clinical intervention is critical to reduce mortality. This study presents a hybrid deep learning model that combines temporal and structural information from clinical data to improve early sepsis prediction.

methodsWe used data from the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019 to predict sepsis onset up to 12 hours in advance. We developed a hybrid model integrating long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and graph attention networks (GAT) to capture temporal dynamics and intervariable relationships. Performance was compared with three baseline models. To ensure robustness, all models were trained using five repeated train-test splits with different random seeds.

resultsThe dataset includes 40 336 adult ICU patients. Of all the patients, 2932 developed sepsis during their stay. Each patient's data includes hourly data on 40 clinical variables, including vital signs, laboratory results and demographic information. The LSTM-GAT model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.853±0.005, an F1-score of 0.627±0.006 and a specificity of 0.872±0.007, outperforming baseline models. Despite being trained on fixed temporal windows, the model generalised well across multiple prediction horizons without retraining. DISCUSSION: By integrating temporal and structural representations, the proposed approach achieves improved predictive performance compared with the baseline. This capability may support earlier identification of high-risk patients and enhance timely clinical decision-making in critical care environments.

conclusionsThe proposed model demonstrates the advantage of combining sequence and graph-based methods. It offers a promising tool for real-time clinical decision support in sepsis detection.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSepsisFemaleGraph Neural NetworksHumansIntensive Care UnitsLong Short Term MemoryPredictive Learning ModelsROC CurveDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDeep LearningElectronic Health RecordsMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42091169
PMCPMC13150876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.