Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42091158›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Sexual violence disclosure in Canadian postsecondary educational institutions: a scoping review.

Jori Jones, Rachelle Ashcroft

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jori JonesUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada jori.jones@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8158-202X
Rachelle AshcroftUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5666-1946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAcross Canadian postsecondary educational institutions, sexual violence persists as a serious yet largely undisclosed harm with profound impacts on students' mental, physical and academic well-being. Canadian scholarship has not been systemically synthesised to clarify how sexual violence disclosure processes are framed or experienced within postsecondary contexts despite disclosure often being the primary way students seek support. The aim of this scoping review was to: (1) characterise existing perceptions of disclosure within Canadian postsecondary sexual violence evidence; (2) identify key sources and perspectives informing the Canadian postsecondary sexual violence evidence; (3) synthesise reported impacts of disclosure for students pertaining to Canadian postsecondary sexual violence and (4) highlight gaps and research priorities for Canadian postsecondary sexual violence.

designA scoping review conducted using Arksey and O'Malley framework, with incorporated enhancements from Levac and colleagues. DATA SOURCES: Documents published between 1 January 2014 and 7 March 2025 were reviewed. These were located through searches in PsycINFO, ERIC, Sociological Abstracts, Criminal Justice Abstracts and SCOPUS, along with targeted searches of organisational and government websites. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed and grey evidence in English, published from 2014 onward that addressed sexual violence in Canadian postsecondary settings were included. Eligible evidence included empirical studies, theoretical papers, reviews, dissertations, commentaries, books, book chapters and organisational reports. Letters to the editor, book reviews and conference abstracts were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Extraction and synthesis examined how disclosure is defined, its purpose, associated barriers and outcomes; the role of intersectionality and power relations; and recommendations to improve sexual violence responses.

resultsA total of 224 documents (164 peer-reviewed articles and 60 grey literature documents) were included in the review. Results indicate disclosure is a complex, iterative process, shaped by systems of power that differentially affect students across intersecting identities. Barriers to disclosure were most often linked to both institutional and structural inequities that influence students' experiences and outcomes. Findings clarify that advancing the safety of sexual violence response and research depends on centring student perspectives and expertise.

conclusionsThis scoping review provides an overview of the power dynamics and risk involved in sexual violence disclosures among students in Canadian postsecondary institutions. Meaningful and transparent application of intersectional and trauma-informed approaches is critical to supporting epistemic safety and cultivating institutional cultures of care rather than perpetuating further harm for Canadian students.

Indexed as

DisclosureSex OffensesStudentsCanadaHumansUniversitiesCanadian Higher EducationPost-Secondary InstitutionsSexual ViolenceSurvivor DisclosureTrauma-Informed Research

Identifiers

PMID42091158
PMCPMC13150887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.