ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2026
Pleasure, shame and harm reduction: A qualitative investigation of poppers and sexualized drug use among men who have sex with men in China.
Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This qualitative study explores the sociocultural meanings and harm-reduction practices surrounding poppers use among men who have sex with men (MSM) in China. Twenty in-depth interviews conducted in Guangzhou reveal that poppers are experienced as both a routine facilitator of sexual pleasure and intimacy, and a source of moral tension. Participants valued the physiological and psychological effects that enhanced receptive anal sex and emotional connection, yet described these benefits often give way to heightened sexual risk, internalized shame, and subsequent guilt. Stigmatizing public health discourses and a restrictive national drug policy context amplified this ambivalence, framing poppers use as deviant and shameful. Despite these challenges, participants demonstrated agency through self-regulation, peer-based harm reduction, and demands for credible, nonjudgemental information. These findings situate poppers use within a complex interplay of pleasure, stigma, and regulation, underscoring the need for culturally grounded, community-led harm reduction that affirms agency and wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.