ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Comparison of five different Light-Cured Pulp Capping Materials to a Hydraulic Calcium Silicate Cement: A Long-Term Physicochemical Study.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSCs) are the gold standard for vital pulp therapy, although they have a prolonged setting time. Light-cured flowable composite resins containing calcium silicate or calcium hydroxide powder are promoted as an alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties of 5 light-cured pulp capping materials (LCPCMs) (Calcimol LC, TheraCal LC, ReViCal, MTA PulpCap, and Pulprotec MTA) with HCSC (Biodentine).
methodsCylindrical specimens (51.472 mm
resultsThe pH value of Biodentine was significantly higher than that of the LCPCM at every time point examined (P < .05). On scanning electron microscopy, hydroxyapatite-like structures were visible on the surface of Biodentine after 7 days, whereas this was not the case for the LCPCM. The energy dispersive x-ray revealed that significantly more calcium was found on the surface of Biodentine than in the LCPCM (P < .05). X-ray diffraction was able to detect hydroxyapatite on the surface of Biodentine, while all materials showed calcite on their surfaces. Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy confirmed these findings and showed polymeric structures in the LCPCM. SIGNIFICANCE: The physicochemical properties of HCSC (Biodentine) examined in this study are superior to those of LCPCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.