ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2026
A two-step temporal data augmentation and supervised learning framework for predicting autism diagnosis at 36 months in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) affects approximately 25-50% of children with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Early identification of ASD in this high-risk population is crucial for timely intervention but remains challenging due to the heterogeneous clinical presentation and complex interplay of genetic, neurological, and environmental factors. This study aimed to integrate longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics with early behavioral features using supervised learning algorithms to predict ASD outcomes at 36 months.
methodsData were obtained from the children enrolled in the TSC Autism Center of Excellence Research Network study. Four DTI metrics: axial diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and radial diffusivity, were measured across 27 major white matter tracts at up to four irregular time points. To account for variability in acquisition timing, we developed a two-step data augmentation algorithm to interpolate each subject's data to standardized ages of 12, 24, and 36 months. In addition, 9 behavioral features from the ADOS-2 and ADI-R assessments at 24 months were included. Supervised learning algorithms were trained to predict ASD diagnosis at 36 months under two input settings.
resultsPerformance of the supervised learning algorithms was evaluated with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as performance metrics. Regularized logistic regression models, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and elastic net, demonstrated the most balanced overall performance across most evaluation metrics. Comparing input settings, Setting 1 (DTI at 24 months + behavioral features) achieved comparable or slightly improved performance relative to Setting 2 (DTI at 12 and 24 months + behavioral features) in predicting ASD diagnosis.
conclusionIntegrating early neuroimaging and behavioral data suggests potential for prediction of ASD outcomes at 36 months in children with TSC. This multimodal machine learning framework highlights 24-month DTI and behavioral measures as key early biomarkers and demonstrates the effectiveness of regularized regression techniques for small-sample, heterogeneous clinical datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.