Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42090840›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2026

Beneficial effects of the rapid vs. standard procedure for injection naltrexone initiation operate through increased adjunctive medication use.

Kara E Rudolph, Shodai Inose, Nicholas T Williams, Iván Díaz, Edward V Nunes, Matisyahu Shulman, Adam Bisaga

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kara E RudolphDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: kr2854@cumc.columbia.edu.
Shodai InoseDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Nicholas T WilliamsDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Iván DíazDivision of Biostatistics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America.
Edward V NunesDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Matisyahu ShulmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Adam BisagaDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.

Funding

Design and analysis advances to improve generalizability of clinical trials for treating opioid use disorderR01DA056407 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Kara Elizabeth Rudolph, Elizabeth A. Stuart · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA056407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the extent to which increased use of clonidine and benzodiazepines is associated with the beneficial effect of the rapid versus standard procedure for induction onto extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX).

methodsWe conducted two mediation analyses using a doubly robust nonparametric estimation approach. First, we estimated the extent to which the difference in XR-NTX initiation rates comparing the rapid vs. standard induction operated through: (1) differences in categorized daily doses of clonidine and benzodiazepines averaged over the first 3 days of the study, and (2) differences in categorized clonidine and benzodiazepine usage during each of the first 5 days, treated as time-varying mediators, and accounting for time-varying confounders and competing events.

resultsRapid vs. standard induction increased the probability of initiating XR-NTX by day 14 by an estimated 42.4 percentage points (95% CI: 34.6, 50.2), and the natural indirect effect (i.e., mediated effect) through clonidine and benzodiazepine use was associated with a 24.2 percentage point (95% CI: 10.3, 38.0) increased the initiation probability, explaining 57.1% of the total effect. Estimates were similar in the longitudinal mediation analysis.

conclusionsUse of clonidine and benzodiazepines proactively and at higher dosages during the initial days of inpatient medically managed withdrawal, in conjunction with attentive safety monitoring, could improve XR-NTX initiation rates as part of a rapid induction procedure.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesClonidineNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansInjectionsMaleTime FactorsBenzodiazepinesClonidineDelayed-Action PreparationsNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsCausal mediationClonazepamClonidineInjectable naltrexoneMOUDOpioid use disorderWithdrawal symptoms

Identifiers

PMID42090840
PMCPMC13255139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.