Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial lesions among beneficiaries of second-level care].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is a major public health problem, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Although human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main causal agent, the relevance of various risk factors varies by context. Objective: To identify familial, sociodemographic, behavioral, and sexual history factors associated with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) in women attending the Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the Regional Hospital with Family Medicine Unit No. 32 in Minatitlán, Veracruz, Mexico. Material and methods: An observational case-control study (1:2) was conducted in women aged 25-60 years with available cytology results. An anonymous questionnaire was applied, and data were analyzed using comparison tests and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: A total of 119 women (37 cases, 82 controls) were included. No significant differences were found between groups for age, age at first intercourse, number of pregnancies, sexual partners, contraceptive use, or smoking. A strong association was found between the presence of SIL and a history of abnormal cytology (crude OR 2916; corrected OR 1322), as well as between SIL and a family history of cervical cancer (OR 2.73). Specific sexual practices showed no association. Conclusions: Some factors considered risk factors showed no association in this population. This highlights the importance of follow-up for abnormal cytology and the need for further longitudinal studies with context-sensitive approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.