ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2026
Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Invasive Coronary Angiography in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The Brazilian Coronary ARtery Disease (BARD) Study.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Coronary Artery Calcium Score, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognosis of nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is not well established. Comparative data between coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) are limited.
objectivesTo compare CCTA- and ICA-derived information in nonobstructive CAD regarding detection and clinical outcomes.
methodsWe followed 4,004 adult patients who underwent either ICA (n = 2,355) or CCTA (n = 1,649) for a median of 9 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome/acute myocardial infarction, and stroke. Propensity score matching was performed to compare outcomes between groups. The significance level was set at 5%.
resultsThe overall event rate was 6.9%. ICA was associated with worse outcomes than CCTA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54; 95% CI 0.42-0.68; p < 0.001). Patients with nonobstructive CAD had worse outcomes than those without CAD (HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.32-2.27; p < 0.001). Normal coronary findings on CCTA were associated with better outcomes than normal findings on ICA (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.24-0.62; p < 0.001). Event rates increased proportionally with plaque burden. In 1,187 matched pairs, CCTA was associated with improved survival (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.42-0.78; p < 0.001).
conclusionCCTA more closely reflects clinical outcomes than ICA. Nonobstructive CAD carries a substantial risk regardless of imaging modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.