ArticleRevista de saude publica2026
Analysis of the monitoring of the expansion of Covid-19 testing and surveillance in a municipality.
Article in Revista de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the monitoring of an intervention for expanding testing, isolation, quarantine, and telemonitoring of Covid-19 (TQT-Covid-Strategy) in an administrative health region of a municipality in Northeastern Brazil.
methodsThis is an evaluative study, whose object of analysis were data produced in the monitoring of a health intervention (TQT-Covid-Strategy), for six months, in 17 health units, namely 12 Family Health Units and five Health Centers. Monitoring matrices created through field reports, workshops with professionals and managers, and permanent education activities were analyzed. Monitoring took place in the three components of the TQT-Covid-Strategy intervention: expansion of accessibility to testing, monitoring of cases and surveillance strategies, and digital platform. The actions in each component were considered adequate (A), partially adequate (P), and inadequate (I) in relation to the activities determined in the action plan and in the protocol of the TQT-Covid-Strategy.
resultsThe component of the expansion of accessibility to testing was considered adequate, while the monitoring of cases and surveillance strategies presented partially adequate or inadequate results in many units. As for the digital platform component, there was predominantly adequate performance in relation to registration and access to test results and case reporting. However, the use of other surveillance-related resources, such as contact tracing, was inadequate.
conclusionsBoosting the institutionalization of monitoring can be an important instrument for the implementation and improvement of health interventions. The regular presence of enablers and a widely disseminated protocol, in addition to community health agents, enhanced the intervention. However, partially adequate or inadequate results reinforced the importance of qualification of the work process in primary health care regarding surveillance actions and the use of information and communication technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.