ArticleRevista de saude publica2026
Covid-19 testing in Primary Health Care: professionals' perceptions.
Article in Revista de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the perceptions of Primary Health Care (PHC) professionals regarding Covid-19 testing in basic health units (BHUs).
methodsThis qualitative study, part of a formative research project, involved 22 semi-structured interviews and 4 focus groups with professionals working in PHC in a Brazilian capital city. Among other criteria, the professional most directly involved in pandemic response measures in each BHU was selected. Content analysis was performed using a deductive analytical approach, in which the findings were organized into categories defined based on the components of the health system (population; infrastructure; organization of services; service delivery or care model; and management).
resultsReports commonly referred, in the population component, to the challenges arising from the limitations of PHC coverage; in the infrastructure component, the insufficiency of human resources and physical infrastructure was highlighted, which in turn required changes in the organization and provision of services, with repercussions on the care model. The contributions also revealed that at some points during the pandemic there was a disruption of the work process, especially in family health teams. In the management component, weaknesses in communication flows between the health secretariat and the BHU were identified, although this was less frequently mentioned.
conclusionThe perception that expanding and decentralizing testing in BHUs was necessary was confirmed. The findings point to the importance of coordinating the pandemic response and effectively decentralizing the actions adopted, of preparedness plans and strengthening PHC and its professionals, as well as investments in infrastructure and team training, and advances in actions aimed at occupational health. The pandemic revealed the importance of advancing the health economic-industrial complex and, fundamentally, strengthening and defending the Brazilian Unified Health System.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.