Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Initial clinical experience with ribociclib in advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Uruguay].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ribociclib improves progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) in women with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC), but real-world evidence in Uruguay is limited. Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and safety profile of women with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer treated with ribociclib plus hormone therapy in Uruguay. Materials and methods: Observational, retrospective study. Demographic and clinical variables, type of hormone therapy, treatment duration, and adverse events were analyzed. Results: A total of 54 patients from public and private institutions were included, with a median age of 60 years. 67% relapsed after adjuvant treatment. Bone was the most common metastatic site (72%). Ribociclib was administered as first-line treatment in 81% of cases, and combined with aromatase inhibitors in 63%. The mean OS was 41.6 months and the mean PFS was 30 months; medians were not reached. Neutropenia was the most frequent adverse event (66%), followed by gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea 33%, diarrhea 28%) and skin toxicity (16%). One death due to pulmonary embolism was recorded, and QTc prolongation was documented in 5.6% of patients. Dose reduction was required in 20%, and one patient discontinued treatment due to skin toxicity. Conclusion: Ribociclib was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with the literature. This study provides relevant local evidence and supports its use in real-world settings. Longer follow-up is needed to more accurately assess OS and PFS outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.